Teach Yourself Android Game Programming


Now, there’s a practical, hands-on guide to mastering game development for Android 4.0 with the Android SDK and Eclipse IDE. One step at a time, this book teaches all facets of mobile game development, from game design and handling user input through publishing via Google’s Android Market. Top game development author Jonathan S. Harbour starts with the absolute basics, making Android game development accessible even to programmers who’ve never written a game before.

In just 24 sessions of one hour or less, he shows how to use free Android development tools to design and construct high-performance, highly-playable games for the newest Android smartphones and tablets. Friendly, accessible, and conversational, this book delivers a practical grounding in Android game development without ever becoming overwhelming or intimidating. Each lesson builds on everything that’s come before, helping readers learn core techniques from the ground up. Readers learn key concepts, syntax, and techniques through short, practical examples that reflect the realities of modern mobile game development.

This book covers the Android 4.0 SDK 19 using Eclipse and the Java language, with step-by-step tutorials on setting up the development environment. A new developer is likely to find Android daunting to break into. This book helps alleviate those challenges by offering sage advice and solid tutorials. This book is for beginners with intermediate coverage of game programming concepts.

More Details Here

Beginning Game Programming, 4th Edition

This new edition retains most of the chapter structure and content but has been updated to Visual Studio 2013. This edition is more accessible with support for the latest software, despite the difficult C++ language and subject matter. It was my goal to make it easy enough to follow that someone with only rudimentary experience in C++ will be able to follow along without getting lost.

This updated fourth edition will introduce beginners to the fascinating world of game programming for Windows using Visual Studio 2013 and DirectX. The book requires only a basic understanding of the C++ language and provides a solid introduction to DirectX programming. You’ll learn the basics of making sprite-based games without getting bogged down in complex 3D rendering. The instruction is step-by-step, building as you go.

Even if you’re new to the subject, you will be able to follow along, learning how to take your game ideas from concept to reality using today’s standard professional game-creation tools. At the end of the book, you will put your new skills to use creating your own complete, fully functional game. Get started in game programming today, with BEGINNING GAME PROGRAMMING, FOURTH EDITION.


An Hour of Code

I support the Hour of Code initiative launched by President Obama and backed by Bill Gates and hundreds of other people. It’s a great idea to inspire the next generation of computer science students! Teaching programming to beginners is what I have devoted over 10 years to by writing programming books for beginners. With titles like Video Game Programming for Kids, Beginning Game Programming, More Python Programming for the Absolute Beginner, and Visual Basic Game Programming for Teens, plus a low-cost course at Udemy, this initiative is just the sort of thing I am happy to endorse.


A Little Gaming Nostalgia

I bought an album by the catchy but now-defunct 10,000 Maniacs with Natalie Merchant. Blind Man’s Zoo took me back to the 1988 World Series game. The Los Angeles Dodgers were led to victory against Oakland by Orel Hershiser. It was an extraordinary game for Hershiser who did his best to keep Oakland from even getting a hit.

This particular game, brought to memory by the haunting lyrics of Natalie Merchant, singing such songs as The Big Parade and Trouble Me, will always be associated with a game of a completely different kind. I was playing a PC game called Sentinel Worlds while watching the game in my room.

Hershiser was throwing pitches through a 12” RCA color TV while the crew of my space ship battled aliens through a 14” Tandy color monitor. I can still hear the music of the game combined with the cheering crowd.



Forum is back up

I’m looking into the problem with the database. It began as a DOS-like attack about two weeks ago with escalating bandwidth usage and doesn’t seem to have affected any other services running on this account, just the forum. Hope to have it back up soon but I’m still not sure what’s wrong and won’t know until the web host company looks into their side.

EDIT: It’s back online at http://jharbour.com/forum


Batman Versus Hollywood


(Michael Keaton with Bob Kane, the creator of Batman)

Do you know the feeling when something is nagging at the back of your mind for a long time (maybe even for years) and you just can’t quite get a handle on it? That’s how I’ve felt about live action Batman movies dating back to my first theater experience of caped crusader–the Michael Keaton movie directed by Tim Burton in 1989. I haven’t quite known how to go about expressing these nagging thoughts until I’d rented and watched Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises again–and I couldn’t finish it.

I was not a serious comic book reader as a kid, although I considered myself a fan of the medium. I spent most of my money on video games as a teenager. At the time I was aware of most of the popular characters through animated TV series. I was not a hardcore fan until many years later when I began to actually read instead of just watch. In other words, I was a Batman fan due to film, not from reading the comics. I watched the syndicated Adam West TV series as a kid, along with Star Trek and Star Blazers, like most kids in the 1980s. I did not read the comics much.

Tim Burton Trilogy

There’s a big difference between fans of the Batman films and fans of Batman, the iconic DC character. Film fans know nothing about the character beyond the films. They may or may not be aware of The Dark Knight and Detective which have contributed possibly even more to the character than the Batman comic has done over the years (by the fact that they must compete for readership while remaining “in the family”).


The first Tim Burton film in his Batman trilogy was 1989’s Batman, starring Michael Keaton as Batman and Jack Nicholson as Joker. It was a wonderful movie, and the first of the modern era. But, Batman was out of character most of the time. Batman never kills criminals, but he does in this movie. The origin story for both Batman and Joker are presented here, and it was very well done, despite the aforementioned problems. I’m sure many fans today are in the same club, having been introduced to the character by this movie. Those fans would also tend to believe that Batman occasionally kills villains.

Was Batman in character in this film? Partially. All of the basics were covered but his behavior was a strange balance of justice versus vigilantism. He was not the detective, nor the dark knight, he was more of a visceral monster in a way.

Batman Returns

In Batman Returns (1992), Keaton reprises his role with two new villains: Michelle Pfeifer as Catwoman and Danny DeVito as Penguin. In both cases, Burton completely failed to understand the characters. He went for pseudo-realism in his portrayal of them both. Catwoman does not have feline DNA as a result of her attempted murder, and Penguin does not have avian DNA as a result of being dropped in any icy river as a baby. Ridiculous!

And again, great fun if you don’t know anything about these characters. Penguin is not a penguin-man, he’s “The. Penguin.” As in, a mobster with a long nose. He does not live under Gotham as a recluse and a freak of nature, he’s a businessman of sorts. Bob Kane himself is credited with writing the characters for this movie, so does that make it canon? Hard to tell. Did Burton follow his own creative direction with them or did Kane come up with them? Either way, they were not true to the comic source material, which brings up another issue.

Why is it that writers and directors of superhero movies feel the need to legitimize the settings and characters, to make them as realistic as possible? Do they feel that audiences will reject a fantastic character without a cause or reason behind their powers?

Was Batman in character in this film? A little better than the previous film, although he’s surprisingly violent again. In one scene, some of Penguin’s men are running toward him, and he starts up the Batmobile’s afterburner to light them on fire.

Batman Forever

1995 saw the release of Batman Forever, with a new actor playing Batman in Val Kilmer. The villains include Jim Carrey as The Riddler and Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face. This movie also introduced movie fans to Robin, played by Chris O’Donnell. Also of interest, Drew Barrymore (“50 First Dates”) plays a girlfriend of Two Face named Sugar, while Nicole Kidman plays a love interest for Batman and Bruce Wayne.

This movie was just plain fun, through and through. It was definitely my favorite of the three, which is why the fourth was so shocking–it was as if some studio exec’s 10-year old was given the next movie… But I digress. In contrast to the previous two, Batman Forever doesn’t take itself too seriously. Val Kilmer brings a fresh new face to both characters and he does a great job with them both. The villains, Two Face and Riddler, seem to have been inspired by the 1960s TV show more so than a modern interpretation.

As I conclude this section on Burton, I’m reminded that Frank Miller was a star writer at DC, having produced Year One and The Dark Knight Returns during the 1980s–stories which audiences simply weren’t ready for until two decades later. Honestly, I really believe that those stories could not be done properly on film (either animated or live action) at the time, due to right wing parenting groups that had a strong voice at the time.

It was a different era with quite different expectations. So, while I have no doubt Burton read Miller, he couldn’t use any of it, and the Two Face (Harvey Dent) and Riddler (Edward Nigma) of the comics stood aside while their cartoon-like caricatures were brought onto the stage.

Strangely enough, Batman Forever went quite against the standard set by the two prior films by not insisting that these characters were 100% realistic. Jim Carrey was brilliant, while Jones had a slightly more subdued presence. My favorite scene is the one where they are fighting over the brain wave machine, sticking the suction cup to their foreheads. Nevertheless, these were TV characters, not drawn from the source comics and certain not canon.

Was Batman in character in this film? Much more so than the previous two. Kilmer gave the character more of the compassionate side of Bruce Wayne rather than the careless messenger of brutality seen previously. He uses his gadgets are more often here.

Joel Schumacher’s Disaster

Batman & Robin is widely known as one of the worst films in the history of superhero movies, possibly only eclipsed by Pitof Comar’s Catwoman (featuring Halley Berry). The director seemed to take the balanced humor in Batman Returns to an inappropriate new level, misunderstanding basically everything about Batman. His irreverence is obvious in the way the film presents one absurd scene after another. It’s almost like Schumacher was forced to do this film and wanted to spite the studio without completely ruining his resume in the process.

One reason why fans were so angered by it is the wasted opportunity to present some beloved characters in live action for the first time, including: Arnold Schwarzeneggar as Mr. Freeze, Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy, Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl (!). George Clooney, who is known for his natural talent for humor, was cast as Batman, and it all went downhill from there.

Was Batman in character in this film? It doesn’t even matter.

Chris Nolan Trilogy

Years go by with Batman fans in a funk over the disaster that was the last Batman film likely to ever be made, because it was such a train wreck. What studio in their right mind would green light another Batman film? Enter Christopher Nolan.

Here in Nolan we have a fan’s fan who has read the print material and knows Batman canon. He cites Year One, The Dark Knight Returns, and The Long Halloween for at least part of the inspiration behind his approach to the character. Rumor has it that his pitch to Warner Bros only lasted a quarter hour before he was enthusiastically approved and funded.

Batman Begins

The first Nolan film is, of course, Batman Begins (2005), which is the origin story for Batman from the source material. There are some scenes taken right out of The Long Halloween. This graphic novel was written by Jeph Loeb, illustrated by Tim Sale, originally published as a 13-issue run in Batman during 1996-97. This story strongly features Catwoman (as very nearly a partner to Batman, a femmé fatale love interest rather than a villain), Harvey Dent as the Gotham DA, and James Gordon as the GPD commissioner.

It is the dynamic trio of Batman, Dent, and Gordon that is first portrayed by Loeb’s story, and clearly evident in Nolan’s writing (as co-author of the screenplay). One might draw upon Frank Miller’s Year One and The Dark Knight Returns stories as the source for Loeb as well, regarding the crime-fighting trio. I found Nolan’s interpretation of Dent (aka Two Face) and Gordon to be spot-on from this perspective. These were real people ala comic people, not fantastic characters forced into the mold of reality as we know it.

Do you see the major difference here from prior movies? This is a character-driven story, not an actor-driven movie. Huge difference! A fan of the prior movies will have been shocked to learn that this is the Dark Knight as he was meant to be portrayed. Slam dunk, Nolan!

The cast: Christian Bale as Batman; Michael Cain as Alfred; Gary Oldman as Gordon; Cillian Murphy as Scarecrow (for the first time!); Ken Watanabe as Ra’s al Ghul (for the first time!); Tom Wilkinson as Carmine “The Roman” Falcone (very exciting for Loeb fans); Mark Boone Junior as Flass (a cop from Frank Miller’s Year One). Unknown characters include: Liam Neeson as Ducard (of Ra’s al Ghul’s Assassin’s Guild); Katie Holmes as never-before-seen friend, Rachel Dawes.

Was Batman in character in this film? Yes, Nolan completely nailed the character, perhaps for the first time in movie history. Bruce Wayne acts like the real Bruce Wayne (from published canon), and Batman acts like Batman, with considerable depth.

The Dark Knight

The second Nolan film, The Dark Knight (2008), had to exceed the standard set by Batman Begins, which was no minor challenge. Of course, the most memorable thing about TDK is the Joker, played by Heath Ledger, who passed away after filming but before the movie’s release. Sadly, his death led to a morbid curiosity in the general public which led to increased viewership (and box office sales).

Ledger had a tough challenge in this role, since he was competing with Jack Nicholson’s Joker from the 1989 Burton film. Who in their right mind would want to compete with Nicholson? Ledger seemed like an unusual choice for the character until we saw him on the big screen, complete with make up job. I’ve often wondered which version of Joker Nolan wrote into the script. Was it Loeb’s Joker, Miller’s Joker, Starlin’s Joker, Winick’s Joker, or even the TV show Joker (played by Cesar Romero)? I’m sure Ledger consumed all of the material while preparing himself for the role.

It seems to me that his portrayal most closely matches the Joker from “A Death in the Family”, the story arc that resulted in the death of Robin (Jason Todd), written by Jim Starlin and illustrated by Jim Aparo in 1988. Judd Winick wrote the script for the animated feature film, Batman Under The Red Hood, which was a movie adaptation of the infamous story. If you haven’t seen the film, it’s a must see, and will open your eyes to the director’s source material for Ledger’s Joker.

In this story, the Joker is hired by Ra’s al Ghul to kidnap Robin in order to distract Batman from his attack against the Assassin’s League. Only, Joker takes it a bit far, nearly beats Jason to death, and then finishes the job with a bomb. And, in a surprising twist, Batman did not arrive in time to save him. Although Red Hood (2010) followed The Dark Knight (2008), the original story featured a truly brutal Joker.

Was Batman in character in this film? That depends, because this is very nearly two films in one. On the one hand, there’s the first half featuring the Joker’s rise to power in the criminal underworld of Gotham. The second half is a bizarre and hard-to-follow terrorist plot that at first seems to be in character for Joker, except that he just doesn’t play games as portrayed (he tends to leave that to his old pal, E. Nigma, the Riddler). The two barges full of people, the mind game involving the triggers, it just didn’t fit in–and this was a trend Nolan followed even more so in the third film. I would say yes, Batman was in character, but Joker wasn’t quite right in the second half, and his capture was anti-climactic. For some reason, Nolan seemed to have 9/11 on the brain here and especially in the next film.

 The Dark Knight Rises

First of all, I’ll clear the air up front by just stating outright that I hated this movie, and still feel very strongly that it ranks up there with the worst of the modern films. It’s not nearly at stinky as Batman & Robin, but I’d say it is close. Admittedly, that’s not a popular opinion. But then, when was the majority rule ever capable of making intelligent decisions? This does not in any way reflect my opinion of the previous two Nolan films; it stands on its own as a poor representation of the character and thoroughly botches canon due to creative license.

Why was it so over the top with the Bane storyline? What is up with the ridiculous digitally-inserted Sean Connery voice?

Movie fans were likely unfamiliar with Bane. His character was true to the source by literally breaking Batman’s spine. The original story is fond in a huge collected edition TPB called Knightfall.

At the time of my first viewing, TDKR reminded me of The Siege (Bruce Willis, Denzel Washington). If you aren’t familiar with it, this film is about a terrorist attack against New York City, with events, scenes, and a story that mirrored TDKR in many ways. It dealt with government abuse of power when martial law is declared, and the danger of having the military police a civilian population. But, isn’t that exactly what happens in TDK Rises? I’m reminded of the scene with Blake escorting a bus full of people across the Brooklyn bridge, with soldiers threatening to blow it if they didn’t stop. It was a powerful scene.

There are some fascinating scenes in this movie for fans of Miller and Loeb, such as Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman playing a love interest and partner for Batman, while still trying to remain aloof (and not really succeeding). Although unrelated, Marion Cotillard’s Miranda as the daughter of Ra’s al Ghul–isn’t her name Talia, the mother of Damien? Maybe al Ghul has more than one offspring but I was only aware of Talia. Secondly, there was the age of Batman, and his associated aging woes, reminiscent of Miller’s TDK Returns. In that story, Bruce had given up Batman for 10 years and only grudgingly came out of retirement when he couldn’t stand the violence taking over the city again. (For reference, be sure to see the animated film adaptation of this remarkable story with a bonus–Batman fights Superman at the end!).

The real problem with this film is a punishingly long terrorist siege of New York City very reminiscent of the aforementioned movie, The Siege. Terrorists…yada, yada, yada. Honestly, the terrorist thing should have been put to rest quickly. We had enough going on in this film so that a long, ridiculously drawn-out scene (over an hour) that it could have easily been cut in half without losing a single important detail. Ultimately, it was leading up to Batman’s sacrificial death and the similarly seemingly endless series of homages to him that followed. Seriously, this needed to move along, it was unbelievably boring, considering this was most of the cast and the same director we saw in the previous films. But, like I wrote earlier, Nolan was already leaning in this direction with his Joker terrorist scene which also dragged on way too long.

And, that’s the gist of it. The movie was too long, and the terrorism thing just wasted too much time that could have been devoted to really interesting scenes with Bane and other characters. Or how about flying the Batjet through the Grand Canyon for 20 minutes? That would have been at least pretty if not similarly wasteful.

Was Batman in character in this film? Seriously, no, not at all. Something changed in Bale’s performance or Nolan’s direction of the same. He was trying to portray an aged Batman, 8 years hence, who was worn out and (like Miller’s story) not quite willing to come out of retirement until he had no choice in the matter. This aging effect was over-played. The struggle to rise up again was the theme of the film, but it was done with nauseatingly fine granularity when, again, the story just needed to move on. It’s one thing to give fans everything they want. It’s another thing to give fans everything they want, and end up with a crowded film.

We’ll see how Batman and Superman handles the character in 2015, under the direction of Zack Snyder (Man of Steel). I’ll try to be objective, knowing Ben Affleck is wearing the cowl. He’ll be playing an aged Batman again, like Bale just did.


Kindle Fire HD 7″ Tablet

kindlefirehdWhile waiting on my pre-ordre of the new Kindle Paperwhite e-book reader, I decided to browse the Kindle Fire HD series of tablets. In retrospect, that might have been a mistake, because I promptly cancelled my pre-order of the Paperwhite and bought a Fire HD 7″ tablet instead.

These are my impressions after using the Kindle Fire HD for less than 24 hours, having had no experience with it prior to this day. First impressions are important. My first impression of the Fire HD is that it doesn’t instantly grab me in the same way the first iPad did.

Where’s the power button, for crying out loud? You would think use testing would have revealed that the power button is impossible to find–not good. On the iPad, there’s an actual button, and actual pair of volume buttons, and a real-life Home button. On the Fire HD, none of the above.

Eventually, you’ll find that the smooth black edge of the Fire HD has a slight break that reveals a button that’s indistinguishable from the black edge without using a fingernail. Again, I have to ask, who thought this was a good idea? Anything that takes me out of the app to screw with the hardware is a VERY BAD THING.

You don’t want your users losing track of where they are in an app to find the stupid buttons that should be easy to find via touch–one sense. If I need to use to senses–touch and sight–and even then have problems, well, we have a problem with the device. In this image, you can just see the power button to the right of the similarly inconspicuous volume buttons. Some might think this is nit-picking, but I feel it’s very nearly a deal killer and am already thinking of ways to enhance the buttons. A case with button openings would solve the problem.


Why such a stickler? Don’t misunderstand, I like this device, which is a terrific value. But what if you need to quickly power off or turn down the volume, while distracted? Navigating even the “Favorites” icon at the upper right is not an option while distracted or in a hurry.

Do the rest of the hardware specs really matter when usage is flawed from the moment you try to power up? I’m not sure because I’m already annoyed with this device. Yes, of course that’s unfair and subjective. I can forgive the button flaw in time. And, this isn’t a review so much as it’s a personal op-ed. For a real review, try Tom’s Hardware.

The apps are the usual Android fare with Amazon’s own custom dashboard and apps built in (extending the Android OS 4.1 “Ice Cream Sandwich”). It takes a little research to find good alternatives to familiar iOS apps, which was not a sales point for me. I knew this was an Amazon device that did not have full access to the Google Play store without a bit of tinkering. I purchased it specifically because it is an Amazon device. If it were merely an Android tablet, with the annoying buttons, I might have been satisfied with the Amazon apps installed–but more likely I would have returned it.

As an Amazon Kindle device, the integration with my Amazon accounts is impressive and very, very welcome. I have an Amazon Prime account which was instantly recognized when I entered my Amazon login credentials. Also seamless was integration with my Amazon Audible account for audiobook access. The content is presented extremely well. Whispersync for Voice reads a Kindle e-book to you with professional narration (via the audiobook edition), with real-time highlighting of the e-book. This is a remarkable feature and one of the three major selling points for me.

I spend about 50% of my iPad time in the evenings browsing Amazon products, reading and writing reviews, managing wishlists. I don’t spend a lot of money in online stores, I just enjoy Amazon primarily for the book listings, and secondly for the media content. I’m also a bargain hunter, usually buying from Amazon resellers rather than buying new products. For instance, the Kindle Fire HD that I’m reviewing here was purchased from a reseller at a significant discount from the full retail price of $159 (which was very reasonable already).

I like the Fire’s user interface, especially the Carousel that shows a revolving icon show of the most recently used apps, albums, movies, and even web sites visited. The carousel adds albums downloaded from the Amazon Cloud, and my first reaction was to remove them from the carousel until I learned to just leave items alone and allow the carousel to sort by usage. My most used apps and content take turns sitting in the top 10 spots for easy access. I like this sorting mechanism better than category links to get to my stuff–and infinitely more than page after page full of app icons (e.g. iOS and Android proper).


The ultimate test for me is whether the Kindle Fire HD easily replaces one or more of my other gadgets (preferably more than one). The iPad set a very high standard. My original 1st-gen iPad is aging, so I’m looking for a new tablet to replace it. The full-size 8.9″ Fire HD would certainly do the trick. A better comparison here would be an iPad Mini, in which case the Fire HD wins hands-down due to the higher resolution. (Keeping in mind, though, that this current-gen Fire HD can only handle 720P, not full 1080P). The question depends on what apps I use on the iPad. I use it entirely for entertainment–no e-mail, no productivity apps (although I own Pages and Numbers, I rarely use them now), no music. The main apps I use are Netflix, Chrome, Amazon Shop, and about 100 games. Since all of these are possible with the Fire HD, then for my usage it can replace an iPad, although the full-size Fire HD would be a better choice there.

Secondly, can it replace my 3rd-gen iPod Touch? Besides music, I also listen to Audible audiobooks with my iPod, so that’s an easy win for the Kindle–it’s Audible integration is much better. A 4th-gen iPod would be a stronger contender since the Audible app can download content directly, while the 3rd-gen requires an iTunes sync. Portability is a fail since the Kindle is too big and heavy to stick into a pocket for a jog or hike. It does succeed, though, as an audiobook player in the car. So on this front, it’s about 50/50. Since this isn’t solely to replace the iPod, that is a bonus. I might get away with not needing a next-gen iPod as a result.

Thirdly, will it replace my two-year old Kindle Touch? Hmm, that’s a more difficult question than the previous two, oddly enough. On the one hand, the Fire HD supports Whispersync for Voice, which I like very much. But, it’s twice as heavy as the Kindle Touch. I have medium-sized hands and don’t mind the weight–I’m used to holding an iPad for hours at a time already. But, the truly great thing about the Kindle Touch is it’s light weight. It literally feels like a paperback novel. In that respect, the Fire HD does not quite succeed and I find myself still wanting a new Kindle Paperwhite. (The cancelled pre-order might have to be re-pre-ordered after all).

Again, it comes down to usage. I love to read outside in the sunlight on my porch chair or lounger. But, admittedly, I only do that about 10% of the time, spending far more time reading in my home-office, the living room, or a cafe during lunch on work days. The 80/20 rule applies. In this regard, due to the extra weight, lower battery life, and readability issue, it only replaces my Kindle Touch 50% of the time.

In conclusion, I find that I have mixed feelings about the Kindle Fire HD. I was hoping it would replace two or three other devices. It might replace an iPad most of the time, and an iPod most of the time, but a Kindle reader only part of the time. In other words, it is not an all-in-one replacement and I find myself still preferring a Paperwhite for reading. There’s just something about the ultra-light weight of the dedicated Kindle that a media powerhouse tablet can’t provide. It does everything else extremely well. It will probably get more use than my iPad and iPod once the alternatives to all of my preferred iOS apps are discovered.


Why I Can’t Give Up My World of Warcraft Account

wowhackedI started playing World of Warcraft (WoW) in January, 2005, shortly after it was first released, back at the time before any expansions were available and the level cap was 60. Back then, also, it took forever to get to level 60! Today, not so much; it’s possible to level a new character up to 90 in a couple weeks if you’re a mad player. Back then, no matter how many hours you put into it there was still a huge amount of grinding required to get to 60.

I don’t play WoW any more, having stopped with the Lich King expansion. A year ago, my account was hacked, necessitating an intervention to recover my characters and their supplies. Curious, I activated both of my accounts and played for a while, with the kids taking turns as well during that single month. It turns out my PC had a problem that caused the game to log off repeatedly, impossible to play. A year later, with a shiny new PC (i5 Haswell, GF 660, 8GB DDR3), I’m much more likely to be able to play successfully without issues.

But, why bring it up after so long? The last time we played regularly was in 2010 at the launch of Cataclysm. My accounts were still Lich King level, so we did not try out any of the new Cataclysm content beyond the 10-day free trial. It was fun, enjoyable. Not worth $39.95, but still a quality product.

Around this time last year, 2012, my accounts were hacked, and I reported the incident to Blizzard, like I said. This just happened again today. Someone hacked my first account, and actually paid $55 (their CC, not mine) to transfer my highest character to a new faction and server. There’s maybe 2,000 gold and misc gear, fairly good stuff but not top-tier. Hardly worth $55. So, I don’t know why someone would do that, but they did indeed, and Blizzard reversed all the damage to that and other characters (and a small, old guild bank).

Here is part of the email Blizzard sent me after restoring my accounts.

“Thank you for your patience . . . We have concluded our investigation . . . The items will be attached to an in-game mail which expire after 90 days.”

I got this notice after getting my inactive WoW accounts restored. Now, if I want my gear and gold to survive this incident, I have to log in and get the stuff out of the mailbox. Which means, I have to subscribe for $16 for one month in order to check the mail, because the mail will expire in 90 days.

Maybe that’s the only reasonable way to fix a hacked account, by sending all the stolen gear back to you via in-game mail. But I can’t check the mail without subscribing again.

Now, I have to log in again to get all the gear back where it belongs, if I ever intend to play again in the future. Realistically, Mists of Pandaria will likely be the last expansion to this aged game. I have no intention of buying it, since somewhere along the way I ended up buying Cataclysm for only one month of play.

No, there are so many better ways to spend my time and money, I have no desire to reactivate WoW. It makes me wonder if this isn’t a conspiracy by Blizzard, done to long inactive accounts, to get them to reactivate? Is that really as paranoid as it sounds? I don’t believe that, because some fool spent $55 to hack my account, probably intending to pick up gobs of gold, not realizing that our characters were rather poor from disuse.

It costs approximately $16/month per account, or $32 for both. I just purchased Skyrim Legendary for $37 from Amazon, to put that price into perspective–and Skyrim has at least a thousand hours of gameplay available if I choose to do everything again (already played it through on the Xbox 360, now looking to enjoy it again with better graphics on my PC).

I’m stuck with a dilemma, and I already know what I”m going to do, but it’s painful. Or is it? Do I really care about all of our old characters enough to want to spend $32 just to pick up their gear from the mailbox? I DO, but I’m not going through with it again this time. I found the gameplay changes in the last two years to be ruinous and I stopped playing because it just wasn’t fun any more.

Not when there’s Civilization V, and Skyrim, and Minecraft, and . . .



The Elder Scrolls Anthology Released Today for $79


This looks like a great collection for an Elder Scrolls fan, as it includes the entire series in one package with an attractive fold-out binder (which reminds me of the Star Wars blu-ray collection). All 5 games are included: Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim. The first two games are dated and run in DOS emulation (with mixed results, as these types of games tend to be–personally, I don’t like DOSbox games beyond the novelty experience). All DLCs/expansions are included with each game, including the three for Skyrim released last year.

Having played Skyrim through on Xbox 360, with the expansions, I do still feel that it’s worth playing again on the PC for the improved graphics and user interface. The graphics quality on the 360 was “nice” but not that great compared to what’s possible with the PC version (especially with quality mods installed).